The survival of online journalism

Posted on 19th August 2019 by Lottie Buckley

page down

Digital advertising can make visiting some online publications an incredibly frustrating experience. You often get bombarded by different advertisements, including pop-ups that cover the article you’re trying to read, distracting flashing banner ads, autoplay videos…the list goes on! There’s nothing more annoying than being unable to find the well-disguised x button to get rid of them, or even worse, accidentally clicking on the wrong part of the screen and being redirected away from your read.

While this can create an exasperating user experience, it’s a difficult dilemma for publishers. Digital advertising provides a critical source of revenue and is key to their survival. If readers have to put up with a few ads every time they want to read an article for free, is that a fair trade-off?

Before widespread use of the internet, we paid for our news by buying newspapers, yet when it moved online, it was made free for all to access. Journalist, David Barnett, likened this to a high street cake shop selling cakes to customers over the counter, but then setting up a website to give away cakes for free! He also points out that, “Once people get used to having something for nothing, it’s an uphill struggle to get them to accept it has any value.”

However, subscriptions and paywall models are proving successful for many national news sites as a way of generating revenue to support their journalism. But for now this alone isn’t enough. Worldwide blog comment hosting service, Disqus, conducted research to find out if and why people pay for news. Only 30.45% of respondents said that they had paid for online news content in the last year. When asked why, the top reasons were, ‘I want to read high quality content on topics I care about from a publication I like’, to ‘fund journalism’s role in society’ and to ‘support a publication’s mission.”

While the majority of readers don’t currently pay to access their news online, the annual Digital News Report from Reuters Institute and Oxford University this year showed that the rise of fake news could soon change that. The online survey of 75,000 people across 38 countries found that 55% said they were concerned about misinformation; a growing trend in many places despite the efforts of governments and social media firms to counter it. In the UK specifically, 70% of respondents agreed with the statement, ‘I am concerned about what is real and what is fake on the internet’, up 12% on the previous year. With this in mind, is it going to become more likely that readers will pay to access their news from a trusted source?

The subscription model has certainly paid off for The Guardian. Guardian Media Group (GMG) recently reported that it has achieved its key financial goal for its core news business, Guardian News & Media (GNM), breaking even at an EBITDA operating level, with profits of £0.8 million. This is in stark contrast to its losses of £19m in 2017/18, and £57m in 2015/16, demonstrating the success of its three-year turnaround strategy. This is thanks, in part, to its paying readers; The Guardian now has over 655,000 monthly paying supporters, across subscribers, recurring contributors and members, and an additional 300,000 one-off contributors in the last year.

But do news sites that stick solely to digital advertising to fund their operations need to address their user experiences? While the advertising revenue helps the publication survive, if visitors aren’t sticking around to read its content because of a frustrating user experience, what is it really offering? And for any publications considering implementing a subscription model alongside their advertising, readers are unlikely to invest if their experience is being disrupted by flashing ads and pop-ups every two seconds.

As businesses, we spend a huge amount of time tweaking and perfecting our websites to improve the user experience we offer, from page load speed to navigation. Anything that could put a visitor off, disrupt their journey, or potentially impact conversion rates is treated as a big red flag. So, do online news sites need to pay more attention to the user experience they provide? In order to maintain solid commercial relationships, retain loyal readers, and perhaps even persuade them to support their journalism with a financial contribution, it’s certainly looking that way.

BROWSE MORE CONTENT

Christmas campaigns: B2B vs B2C

At Skout, as you may have seen on our social feeds, we’ve already got our Christmas campaign in full swing! And no doubt, many other B2B companies will have also set the cogs in motion to capitalise on the festive season, whether that involves developing a creative festive-themed campaign idea, or simply using it as […]

Read more...

Posted on
What role should social media play in this election?

Over six million people tuned in to watch Corbyn and Johnson go head to head in the first debate of the upcoming general election. But it wasn’t just what the two political parties were doing on camera that got the public’s attention. The Tories came under fire for renaming one of its Twitter accounts a […]

Read more...

Posted on
Why SMEs should be surfing the podcast wave

In the not so distant past, the Skout team were visited by an agency which specialised in different methods of broadcast, and this got our cogs turning. Over the past few years, the popularity of the podcast has grown tremendously. Apple alone reported an increase of over 200,000 podcasts since June last year; and now […]

Read more...

Posted on

Get in touch?

DOWNLOAD THE INTEGRATION IMPERATIVE WHITE PAPER

Marketing has come a long way from the traditional approach of single channel strategy.

Nowadays businesses are open to many more lines of communication with their potential customers. It is therefore imperative to target them across multiple channels to catch the same people, more effectively through multiple touch points.

Download our white paper to find out how to develop a fully integrated marketing strategy.

Download now